After learnining about the Van Hiele Geometric Levels of Thinking- where do you think you generally fit into this framework? How will you use this information in your instructional practice?
I generally fit into the Level 3 of the Van Hiele framework. Geometry is honestly not my favorite part of math. I think several not-so-positive experiences in geometry have influenced the way I feel about geometry. I hope to help my students develop an appreciation for geometry rather than them feel the way I do about geometry. I understand most concepts of geometry, but that does not mean I truly appreciate the subject.
In my instructional practice I will make an extra effort to research and learn more about fun and meaningful activities for students in my early childhood classroom. Increasing my knowledge of geometry will help me better teach my students concepts of geometry. Making geometry meaningful and encouraging challenging experiences will help students to become more interested in geometry, hopefully giving students a chance to grow to level 4 of the Van Hiele framework.
It is good that you are aware of your feelings about geometry- you are going to have to work hard to avoid displaying your biases as you teach. Students will identify with the fact that you don't like the area and will begin to adapt those same feelings.
ReplyDelete